Presentation Packages Tamed (ppt)

One unremarked feature of books is that you can labour points; because most people read them from front to back, you can make points and then revisit and emphasise them, with a decent delay. Websites are not like that; you may by virtue of automatically generated navigation, come to this page, which is a spun/reprised/selectively emphasised version of the now out-dated

"OHP use—designing presentations" immediately after having read the "original". Sorry.

On the other hand you are likely to be a user of a presentation package, and so the issue of the impact of the technology on the teaching and learning process deserves active attention. The debate/argument about the virtues and vices of PowerPoint™ and similar (just as good, and free) packages, continues to rage... or simmer... or bubble occasionally. OK, you may not have noticed it at all, but some points are still worth noting.

Advocates claim

vs.

Opponents claim

Packages are easy to use and produce professional-looking presentations   It's too easy to produce slick and facile presentations which go on and on and bore the pants off us all
They encourage you to break material up into manageable bullet-points.   Yes, to break everything up into the same kind of bite-size knowledge-lite.
They enable you to add graphics and animations   ...usually irrelevant clip-art which we have all seen before and does not add anything to the content: in fact often the gratuitous use of special effects undermines and detracts from it.
They complement the verbal material   ...all too often they simply reproduce it, and how often have presenters/lecturers turned their backs on you to read their own projected stuff?
They help you to structure the material   ...perhaps, in a linear fashion. But they structure your material, rather than the students' understanding. Insofar as they do the latter they impose your shape on it.
They can generate handouts automatically   So students can just get them off the VLE and regurgitate them. It turns students into passive consumers
Students like them   Often true: but what is it about them they like, and why? And although they may prefer their apparent clarity to scrawls on a board, what might they find even better?

It does not have to be this way. None of the problems is insuperable.

"PowerPoint is Evil!" Tufte's article is available here. and a discussion thread here

To reference this page copy and paste the text below:

Atherton J S (2013) Learning and Teaching; [On-line: UK] retrieved from

Original material by James Atherton: last up-dated overall 10 February 2013

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

Search Learningandteaching.info and associated sites:

Delicious Save this on Delicious        Click here to send to a friend     Print

This site is independent and self-funded, although the contribution of the Higher Education Academy to its development via the award of a National Teaching Fellowship, in 2004 has been greatly appreciated. The site does not accept advertising or sponsorship (apart from what I am lumbered with on the reports from the site Search facility above), and invitations/proposals/demands will be ignored, as will SEO spam. I am of course not responsible for the content of any external links; any endorsement is on the basis only of my quixotic judgement. Suggestions for new pages and corrections of errors or reasonable disagreements are of course always welcome. I am not on FaceBook or LinkedIn.

Back to top